Archive for April, 2008

The Portrait of God in the Old Testament

April 29, 2008

Through the classes I teach at Grace, a common question that people ask is about the portrait of God as found in the Old Testament.  The struggle is that there seems to be a different portrait of God in the OT as we find in the New Testament (Christian Scriptures).  Thus, people question if there are really two gods or if God changed in character from the portait in the OT to the God we know through the ministry of Jesus Christ and his followers. 

A man in the early 2nd century of the Common Era (A.D.) named Marcion was one of the first who “rejected the idea that the Old Testament God and the New Testament God were the same being” (see Chris Price per Peter Kirby’s blog).  This perspective has indeed continued to the present day, in spite of the dominant perspective of the church arguing for the continuity of God in the Bible.  But then how do we then make sense of the varied portaits? 

Negative Aspects of God perceived in the OT:

  1. Vengeful – if someone sees God, if someone touches the Ark of the Covenant, when the people of God create an idol at the foot of Mount Sinai, etc.
  2. Seeking destruction and dispossession of peoples and property in the land of promise (see Deut. 12:29; Josh 6:21).
  3. Many others: Destroying Sodom & Gomorrah, Holy Wars, the Flood, etc.

There are likely many options to argue how God is the God found in the OT and the NT:

Option 1: The lens to see reality and worldview of a particular people is limited, and thus in the OT the people describe God given their current culture and lens.  The portait of God (and God’s request for actions) is biased by the limitations of the people at that time.  This option argues that there is a distinction between the character of God and the character of God as perceived by the people in a particular time and place.  Thus, when we come to the NT, the character of God has not changed, rather the perception of God is presented by a people in a different time with different areas of focus. 

Option 2: The portait of God in the OT is balanced by many other attributes (merciful, slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, seeking to bless all peoples, the God of all creation, etc.), which are not embraced in the same way the more negative aspects are, giving a limited portait of God in the OT.  This often happens when people are alarmed by what God says or does, but the totality of God’s character is not kept in view. 

Option 3: Another understanding argues that the understanding of God changed as the people of God developed (matured), as in developmental psychology.  The way of relating to the early tribes of Israel and people of the Exodus was more reflective of a parent and a younger child – more blunt, declarative, etc.  Then when the people of God mature, the way God relates to God’s children was more reflective of a parent and a child moving into adulthood, needing to take more responsibility and see the basis of their actions.  (There is a risk in assuming that the early children of God are immature, while the people in the NT reflect mature children – this is especially risky when we project Jews (of today and throught history) as immature, while Christians as the more mature ones.  I disagree and want to guard against such ideas). 

Questions for Reflection:  What do you think?  What perspectives do you hold?  How do you understand the character of God as found in the OT?  How does this shape your ways of reading Scripture? 

The Crisis of Younger Clergy – 3 of 3

April 23, 2008

The Crisis of Young Clergy textOne of the recommendations of The Crises of Younger Clergy is the need for congregations to “cultivate call among the young.”  In the United Methodist Church, clergy come only from the local church, and thus there is a need for congregations to invite their young persons (and older persons) to consider how it is that God might be calling them. 

When I use the language of “call” I don’t intend to limit it to only the ministry of a clergy person, but rather to help persons live into their gifts and graces in a way that is in concert with the way that God created them.  Most people may not be called to a clergy role of ministry, but that doesn’t mean they are not called and are not in ministry.  Being a baptized disciple of Jesus Christ means that you are in ministry and are called to follow in service of God and neighbor in a particular way. 

Growing up a member of the United Methodist Church in Bird City, KS, I don’t recall ever wrestling with the idea that maybe God had hopes and a vision for my life.  I don’t remember considering that my life could have a “vocation” – a pursuit connected to the voice of my life.  I didn’t ponder that my life’s work could be connected to my faith. 

What about you?

  1. When have you been asked, how is it that God is calling you?
  2. Did you consider that God had a vision for your life and ministry when you were young?
  3. What steps might the church take to make sure to call new leaders (lay and clergy)?

 

Video Highlights of Justice Revival – Jim Wallis

April 18, 2008

Here are a few video highlights from the Justice Revival that happened in Columbus, OH recently, featuring Jim Wallis, the CEO of Sojourner Magazine.  The portion that I was most moved by are Jim’s comments regarding the good new of Jesus Christ. 

Question: For whom is the good news of Jesus Christ good?

Taking an Online class with Dustin

April 18, 2008

In a few days I will be taking some training so that I can offer online classes using Blackboard through BeADisciple.com.  My expectation is to offer at least one Online Lay Academy class next fall.  So I have questions for you:

  1. Would you be willing to take an online class?
  2. What topic(s) would interest you for such a class?
  3. How long of a class would you commit to?

 

General Conference 2008

April 17, 2008

The General Conference of the United Methodist Church will be gathering next week in Fort Worth, TX.  This is a quadrennial meeting to decide policy and legislation that affects the whole of the church.  The Kansas East Conference will have 3 clergy and 3 laity delegates of the total 990 delegates from around the world. 

I will be leading a class at Grace, along with Rev. Frank Dorsey, called “What is General Conference?”  It is a basic class to help people learn more about the organizational structure of the United Methodist Church, as well as to stay connected with what happens in Fort Worth this year.  The class will meet in room 222 on Tuesdays (April 22nd, 29th, and May 6th) from 7:00pm to 8:30pm.  Please come join us for this journey!  Here is a pdf of the class notes of the first session: What is General Conference – Class Notes – 1.  Let me know your thoughts!

You can also stay connected via the UM homepage

Question: What are your hopes for General Conference 2008?

Idol Gives Back – What about Us?

April 17, 2008

Last week American Idol, a show Shelly and I follow, did their second annual “Idol Gives Back.”  The purpose was to raise funds for many very worthy charities and mission groups.  Both years I have been very moved by the stories of people around the world and even in our back yards, who are struggling to survive.  My perception is that Idol seeks to raise fund, but also expose the atrocisties of our world, calling people to give either of their resources or of their time and love to change people’s lives. 

Where does the Church participate in this work?  I have been impressed by how Idol has take great steps to connect the millions of viewers each week, with the world’s largest problems.  What might we be able to do if we joined our voices in a movement to advocate for the least, the lost, and the last, with our government, and others in power in our world to make a larger impact in our world? 

In 2005 Shelly and I visited the UN and we saw this chart on the wall (graphic), visually describing how the world spends its resources.  As you may be able to see, most of the money goes towards Military.  In 2004 that figure was about $1 Trillion; it has only grown since then. 

In Brian McLaren’s book, Everything Must Change: Jesus, Global Crises, and a Revolution of Hope, he wonders what would happen if we as the US (or even the global world) would tithe our military budgets to changing the issues of greatest need – hunger, AIDS, potable water, primary education, etc.  What revolution of hope would come from this opportunity? 

I am thankful to Idol for giving back and for helping people understand some of the greatest needs of the world.  How do we take the next step?  We start by educating ourselves, by catching a vision of God’s Reign here on earth, and by growing in relationship with those in most need in our communities. 

Questions: What do you think we are called to do?  How might giving back be too small of a vision in comparision to Jesus’ call to live into the kingdom of God?

Lewis Fellows Program

April 16, 2008

Recently I learned that I have been accepted into a program seeking to strengthen younger clergy in their pastoral leadership skills.  The program is called the Lewis Fellows through the Lewis Center for Church Leadership in Washington, D.C.  This program will last for one year, and the group of Fellows will gather four times for three days each at various venues across the nation. 

I am very excited about this opportunity and hope it will provide beneficial connections with other younger clergy across the US, as well as strengthen my skills in leadership and visioning for my ministry at Grace.

Rock Chalk – KU

April 9, 2008

My wife and I both went to Kansas State University, however, since I have been married, my wife has been influencing me to follow and enjoy KU sports as well.  Shelly grew up watching KU B-ball with her father (who in a KU grad), so in spite of going to KSU, she has remained a KU fan. 

My interest in KU sports also increased when Shelly and I lived in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.  Living on the East coast we were thrilled to be able to watch anything of the Big XII, and especially anything related to the state of Kansas.  So, I learned to cherish both schools and their programs. 

Now that we serve a congregation only 30 minutes from Lawrence, we find that many of the people of Grace are fans of both schools. 

It was a joy to watch them play (actually yelled a lot!).  I ended up in second place in my bracket challenge – Methoblogger pool.  I have even agreed to wear a KU championship shirt in the coming months, probably a T-shirt that will match our child’s! 

Book Review: The Crisis of Younger Clergy – 2 of 3

April 9, 2008

The Crisis of Young Clergy textChapter eight of The Crisis of Younger Clergy is titled, “Deployment of Young Clergy”.  The chapter begins with a quote from Lyle Shaller (A Mainline Turnaround, 2005),

“talented ministers are ‘set up to fail’ by being invited to serve churches where their gifts, skills, experience, personality, and other characteristics do not match the needs and culture of that congregation at this point in its history” (61-2).

Indeed that is the case for many of my younger clergy peers, especially in a previous conference.  The understanding coming from the episcopal cabinet was that we were called to “bloom where we are planted.”  While I agree that we are called to grow into the positions and roles to which we are appointed, this platitude misses the vital horticultural practice of having a correct environment for a particular plant to grow.  Growing up on a farm in western Kansas, we would have never tried to plant corn in our fields dominated by dry and sandy soil.  There would not be enough nutrients, nor water for the crop to yield enough to meet the expenses of that particular operation. 

I have had younger clergy peers who were placed into common “first-time” placements – those that no one else wanted, partly to put them into a new environment, but maybe also to “pay their dues”, or to require them to ”wait their turn.”  The result was them becoming quite depleated as individuals, so much so that their desire to serve God and their community quickly became a painful burden.  Multiple peers seriously considered finding their calling fulfilled in other venues or other denominations. 

Weems & Michel’s text offer suggestions regarding the deployment of young clergy:

  1. Pay significant attention to the appointments of our young clergy, so that they might begin their ministry with strength and health – even be able to form habits that will carry them through their years.
  2. Appoint young clergy where they can make a difference – placing them where they can utilize their gifts and graces, and find a community of peers to support them.
  3. Use associate positions strategically – given that 40% of younger clergy are associates, see their role as a time of training, not becuase they cannot do the ministry of others, but as opportunities to learn and develop.
  4. Re-consider Itineracy – younger clergy do not statisically agree that the current UM system works well.  Maybe we are at a point of relooking at how we deploy all of our clergy leadership.
  5. Re-consider Guarenteed Appointments – younger clergy today are not strong advocates of our current guarentee practice.  How might the UMC find ways to strengthen its clergy leadership, while also challenging them to become the leaders we have been waiting for?

Questions: What vision of ministry and clergy leadership will help our current congregations flourish and become vital into the years ahead?  What changes do you suggest?  How might the young clergy help change the system?

Book Review: The Crisis of Younger Clergy – 1 of 3

April 8, 2008

The Crisis of Young Clergy textI received in the mail the text, The Crisis of Younger Clergy, by Lovett H. Weems Jr. and Ann A. Michel, on April 2nd, via amazon.com.  I just finished reading it and find it helpful as we think about the future of the church, especially the United Methodist Church. 

 This text focuses primarily on where we are at with regards to the clergy leadership of the United Methodist Church, especially in relation to those who are commissioned and ordained as elders under the age of 35.  In 2007 there were 876 such individuals.   The text then moves to argue for vital steps needed for the church to remedy this situation at multiple levels: local church, districts, conference, and general church.

 The basis of the data for this text was an assessment that the Lewis Center for Church Leadership carried out in 2006.  Shelly and I participated in this assessment back when we lived and served in the Eastern Pennsylvania Conferece.  That assessment, along with additional researched that Weeems and Michel have performed, provide the basis of data of this text. 

 The most striking evidence is to compare the number of less than 35 years old clergy over the past 35 years.  Here are the numbers:

  • In 1973 21.2% of the elders were under 35 years old.
  • In 1985 15.1% of the elders were under 35 years old – 3,219 of the 21,378 clergy
  • In 2007 only 4.92% of the elders were under 35 – 876 of the 17,800 clergy

 These numbers are stagering, and yet, they also reflect the general nature of the church – it is an aging gathering of disciples, continuing to discern what it is called to do and be in the world.  Thus, as the authors note, our efforts for younger clergy are tied inextribcably to the renewal and revitalization of the church.

 This text was helpful to confirm my perspective of the ministry as elder in the UMC, and yet much of the information was not new.  There is the statement that this text sounds a horn of warning about the state of the church and especially its leadership, however, I think that this horn has already been blown.  The vital point will be how we will seek to make change that will invite new persons to respond to the call of God to be in leadership (both clergy and lay) with our congregations. 

See the discussion of the topic “Q&A: Why young clergy are important to the UMC” with Dr. Weems on The UM Portal. 

Questions: What steps ought to be taken by our own conference, to ensure strong leadership now and into the future?  Is God no longer calling younger clergy into full-time pastoral ministry?  Or are we not providing an enviroment for those younger disciples to respond and flourish?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.